Negative gearing is one of Australia's most-debated property tax mechanics — and one of the most misunderstood. The shorthand is: your rental property loses money on paper, so the ATO reduces the tax you owe on your other income. The calculator above is showing exactly how that paper-loss gets converted into a real refund.
The formula is plain: rental income − all deductible expenses = rental loss. When that's negative, the loss flows through to your annual tax return and reduces your assessable income by the loss amount. The actual refund is that loss multiplied by your marginal rate — the top tax bracket you fall in.
Deductible expenses on an investment property typically include: loan interest (not principal), council rates, water, insurance, repairs and maintenance, property management fees, body corporate fees, depreciation under Division 43 (capital works) and Division 40 (plant & equipment). The calculator splits Div 43 and Div 40 because they behave differently at sale — Div 43 reduces your CGT cost base, Div 40 doesn't.
What's NOT deductible: the principal portion of your loan repayment, stamp duty (it sits in the CGT cost base instead), and any capital improvements (those depreciate over time, they don't deduct in the year you spend them).
The cashflow vs the refund — don't confuse them
A common trap: investors look at the refund and think "this property is making me money". The refund only exists because the property is losing money first. You pay the loss in real cash (typically tens of thousands a year on a freshly-bought property). The ATO refunds a percentage of that loss based on your marginal rate. The net position — after refund — is still negative for most negatively-geared properties. The calculator's headline weekly cost shows this honest figure: it's the cash you'll find each week to keep the property after the refund lands.
The bet behind negative gearing is that the eventual capital gain at sale exceeds the cumulative out-of-pocket losses. The calculator's CGT card lets you stress- test that assumption against both pre-2027 and post-2027 tax regimes.